Sunday, April 24, 2016

Texas Crazy, Redux

 Opinion | thepilot.com

It’s hard to believe, but Donald Trump may not be the biggest embarrassment the Republican Party has to deal with this election year. Not as long as there’s a place called Texas.


It seems that 22 local GOP conventions in Texas have passed resolutions calling for a vote at the party’s state convention on whether that state should secede from the Union. According to a story in The Houston Chronicle, this number is up from 2012, when only one local convention endorsed the idea.
Now, normally, if someone started babbling about what a good idea it would be to repeat the mistake of 1861, people would quietly start edging away. But this is Texas, and this is the Republican Party circa 2016.
This is the state where the people of the right wing claim to revere the U.S. military but freak out and claim it’s an “invasion” when that military begins conducting routine maneuvers in the state — and their governor buys into the paranoia to the point where he sends the state militia down, just to keep an eye on things.
And lest we forget, this is the party that’s about to nominate a delusional, blustering reality show host to lead the Free World.
This is also the party whose dominant right wing still lionizes Allen West, whose chief of staff once loudly declaimed on camera that “if ballots don’t work, then bullets will.” So the rise of secessionist sentiment — or any kind of lunacy for that matter — in either the GOP or the Lone Star State should come as no surprise.
So will the Texas GOP actually vote for secession? The party establishment hopes that it never even comes to a vote. But then again, the establishment hasn’t been racking up a lot of victories against the rising tide of bat-spit craziness that’s engulfing their party.
So yeah, it could happen. And what if it does? And what if the Republican legislature and the aforementioned governor go along with it? Would Texas actually try to secede? You wouldn’t normally think such a thing would be possible, but then again, would you normally think the words “Republican front-runner Donald Trump” would ever be said with a straight face?
Well, if they do try to pull out of the Union — again — we’re going to have to close the military bases. Goodbye, Forts Bliss and Hood. Goodbye, Fort Sam Houston. Goodbye, Lackland, Randolph, Goodfellow, Laughlin, Sheppard and all the other Air Force bases, great and small. Goodbye to the Naval Air Stations at Corpus Christie, Fort Worth and Grand Prairie.
Sorry, Texas. I’m sure all those base towns will muddle through without the money and jobs the military brings to them. People will just flock to places like Killeen and Wichita Falls once the terrible occupying force of the U.S. government is gone.
Oh, and you’re going to need to find someone else to help you keep the Houston Ship Channel clear, because I wouldn’t expect the Army Corps of Engineers, those tools of a tyrannical regime, to keep dredging it for you.
This leaves the question: What do we do about Austin? Despite being the state capital and thus a locus for all the craziness that is Texas politics, by all accounts, it’s still a pretty cool place, what with that “Austin City Limits” show and the South by Southwest Festival and all. Maybe we can make it into a sort of 1950s Berlin-style enclave and supply it by air with weed and arugula.
There are lots of other details to be worked out. We’d need to arrange safe passage, for instance, for Willie Nelson. But in the end, we could let Texas be a sort of Promised Land to which all of those disaffected, angry, paranoid and just plain crazy right-wingers could settle. A sort of Israel for wingnuts.
Or here’s an idea, and one that only seems crazy in the context of these crazy times: The Texas GOP, and the Republican Party in general, could grow a spine, stop tiptoeing around these lunatics in the hope of keeping their votes, declare in no uncertain terms that any talk of secession or armed rebellion is outright treason, and kick these nuts to the curb.
Of course these secessionist idiots have a First Amendment right to babble their anti-American nonsense, but the Republicans don’t have to give them a forum.
THE GOBSHITES SPEAK: Frequent commenter Peyton E. Cook whines: 
As a Texan by birth, I resent my state called 'un-American.' 
Aww. Poor thing. Of course you do. Resentment is what you people are best at. 
But Mr. Rhoads [sic] is master [sic] of calling names. 
And Mr. Cook seems to be a master of misspelling them. 
He also appears to know little of the history of Texas. Americans began to migrate to Texas in the 1820s. The Mexican government encouraged this migration and gave large grants of land to individuals such as Stephen F Austin and my ancestor, Hayden Edwards. The purpose was to provide defense against Indians. The Mexican citizens were no armed [sic] , and their military resources were limited in Texas. The Americans were very familiar with arms. Over time the Americaa [sic] settlers became restive under Mexican rule and rebelled in 1835. The Texas Army under Sam Houston defeated the Mexican Army under Santa Anna in 1836. The Republic of Texas was formed with Houston as the first President. It remained an independent nation until becoming a state in the United States by TREATY in 1845. There are many in Texas that the current Administration [sic]  is destroying the United States created by the Constitution in 1789. There is ample evidence of that. As a result, the terms of the Treaty of 1845 has [sic] become null and void and Texas should become a nation again.
Unfortunately for Mr. Cook, he knows as little about the history of post-Civil-War Texas  as he does about spelling and grammar. Otherwise,  he'd know about this:
 Be it ordained by the people of Texas in Convention assembled, That we acknowledge the supremacy of the Constitution of the United States, and the laws passed in pursuance thereof; and that an Ordinance adopted by a former Convention of the people of Texas on the 1st day of February, A.D. 1861, entitled "An Ordinance to Dissolve the Union between the State of Texas and the other States, united under the compact styled 'Constitution of the United States of America,'" be and the same is hereby declared null and void; and the right heretofore claimed by the State of Texas to secede from the Union, is hereby distinctly renounced. Passed 15th March, 1866.
SOURCE:

The Constitution of the State of Texas, as Amended by the Delegates in Convention Assembled, Austin, 1866. Austin: Printed at the Southern Intelligencer Office, 1866, p. 32.

4 comments:

  1. Meh. If I've learned nothing else from reading history and following current events, it's that if a sub-cultural enclave doesn't want to be part of a bigger political entity - trying to force them to fit/stay just produces more problems than its worth.

    And, frankly, Texas isn't worth one single drop of a true patriots blood nor a single cent of their hard earned money to hang onto. If Texan's collective panties are really in all that big of a wad over having to make compromises with "the liburls", then good bye and good riddance.

    Oh, and they can keep the damned bases and the hardware. Good luck finding enough soldiers/sailors/airmen/marines to keep it all manned, let alone working - but that's then a tax burden off the rest of us. They like their guns and their warplanes and tanks so much, just let them keep them running.

    Also, I'm not sure just how enthusiastic the citizens would be when it's made clear to them that joining Texas in secession means giving up social security, medicare, Medicaid, etc. And negotiating all their own trade deals. And needing passports to leave Texas.

    I'm pretty sure once the implications and actual costs of leaving the union became clear, I bet talk of secession would vanish in a puff of reality.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice work, quoting the Texas Resolution from when they rejoined the Union. I was on a Facebook thread the other day where some historical wing nuts were decrying Northern aggression and saying anyone who believed secession was about slavery hadn't read any history written since 1960. I found the original South Caroline Declaration of Secession, which says it's about slavery in so many words. Turned that discussion around on a dime. Completely changed the players. After that it was all people who must have known better all along and didn't want to start a fight. I've tried to stay out of political discussions lately, but I still have a high regard for facts.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dana, I've got a friend who actually went and looked up ALL of the secession declarations. And guess what? Every single one of them said in so many words that it was about slavery. "States' rights" got a mention in passing here and there, but the specific right in question was always the right to own other people. Nothing else.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Celine, you're right. So we have the ironic spectacle of Southern apologists having to rely on the statements on non-abolitionist northerners to make their case that secession--and therefore the war--wasn't "about slavery." To the South, it damn well was.

    ReplyDelete