Monday, June 21, 2010

Obama's Katrina?

Latest Newspaper Column:

Is the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico “Obama’s Katrina”?

Certainly a lot of right-wing pundits and radio hosts would like to make it so. But then, these people have been looking for something to dub “Obama’s Katrina” since the day he took office.

As the watchdog site Media Matters points out, nearly every crisis, no matter how large or small, has been described by someone as “Obama’s Katrina”: the H1N1 flu, the Fort Hood shootings, the failed Christmas Eve plot by the Undiebomber, ice storms in Kentucky, the Haiti earthquake, the GM bankruptcy, the Nashville flood — I guarantee you, if Obama ever appears in public wearing white after Labor Day, someone’s going to call it “Obama’s Katrina.”

The ironic thing about all this effort to dub the spill “Obama’s Katrina” is that the people who are so eager to do so, such as Rush Limbaugh, are some of the very same people who became bitterly angry when the blame for that botched rescue and relief effort was laid at the feet of President George Dubbya Bush and his cronies.

So maybe when Limbaugh calls this “Obama’s Katrina,” he’s calling it “a really big and unmanageable thing that someone else screwed up and that’s totally unfair to blame the president of the United States for.” But probably not.

The major difference between this and the Katrina debacle is this: Hurricane relief was something the government knew how to do and didn’t do it. For example, as I pointed out a couple of weeks ago, we don’t have a secret oil-well-capping ship hidden away.

During Katrina, on the other hand, we did have a U.S. Navy ship (the USS Bataan) steaming right into the Gulf behind the hurricane with a full complement of helicopters, 1,200 sailors and Marines, a water purification plant and a fully functioning hospital — and it steamed around for six days waiting for orders while people suffered and died.

And that’s just one example of things we knew how to do, but which didn’t get done because of incompetence all the way up and down the governmental chain.

In contrast, we don’t really know how to plug a leaking oil gusher a mile under the ocean. And while we have some technology for containing oil spills (booms and the like), this is the biggest spill anyone’s ever seen. Scientists are studying effects they’ve never seen before. We are, in the words of Indiana Jones, “just making this up as we go.”

This, of course, raises the question of whether we should be drilling that deep at all, or whether we should, as Canada does, demand that the oil companies drill a relief well at the same time as the main one, as well as providing a plan in case of blowouts.

But that’s not a question you’re likely to be hearing from the crowd that was mocking the idea of keeping your tires properly inflated to save gas and chanting, “Drill, baby, drill” in 2008.

Some have faulted the president for not visiting the area enough. In response, the White House has stepped up presidential visits to the Gulf Coast to the point where you begin to wonder if he might ought to just move the whole White House down there. Of course, this leads to criticism from the “Obama is always wrong” crowd that he didn’t come down sooner.

But you know what? If I’m someplace where everything is going down the tubes, I don’t want the president of the U.S. on the ground in the area, sucking up the attention, trailing a battalion of reporters and causing security headaches.

I want him nice and comfy in the White House Situation Room, watching the thing in real time with communications and overhead satellite surveillance that only God himself could rival, surrounded by smart people who he listens to, and a phone he can give orders into. That’s why they built the Situation Room in the first place.

The president summoned top BP oil executives, including CEO Tony Hayward, to a meeting at the White House on Wednesday. We don’t know everything that was said, but there’s one phrase made famous at the time of Hurricane Katrina that I’m pretty sure Obama didn’t use. I’m reasonably sure no one said, “You’re doing a heck of a job, Tony.”

7 comments:

Charlieopera said...

If I’m someplace where everything is going down the tubes, I don’t want the president of the U.S. on the ground in the area, sucking up the attention, trailing a battalion of reporters and causing security headaches.

That is remarkably similar to the excuse George W. Bush gave for not landing sooner in New Orleans after Katrina.

I want him nice and comfy in the White House Situation Room, watching the thing in real time with communications and overhead satellite surveillance that only God himself could rival, surrounded by smart people who he listens to, and a phone he can give orders into.

As opposed to campaigning? Those smart people haven’t impressed yet, but they should continue to take their time. There’s obviously no rush.

As for what he said to Tony Hayward, it must’ve been pretty rough stuff since it forced the poor man to run off to his yacht for some R&R.

Nobody blames Obama for the spill, Dusty. It’s the lack of coordinated response since that boggles the mind; that plus his ability to continue to be “assured” by BP officials ... they’ve already proven they can’t be trusted (five years ago and probably long before the Houston explosion). Those 11 aren't the first to die for BP.

As for drill baby drill, Obama gave the go ahead for new wells just a week before this mess. Everybody makes mistakes ... including Obama. There’s no longer any denying that, my friend.

Werehatrack said...

A little comparison here...

Bush ignored the fact that the Katrina situation was utter chaos due to gross mismanagement in a disaster for which the government was prepared, doing nothing as things got worse despite having the power, authority and duty to fix it; Obama has been keeping closely apprised of what's being done in a situation in which the government has no expertise and no tools to bring to bear, and has been leaning increasingly hard on those who have the primary responsibility (and, presumably, capacity) to do what needs to be done.

Bush continued to let things fall apart; Obama declared an immediate moratorium on repeating the core mistake, and then FIRED the official who ignored it.

From down here on the coast, it looks like this mess is mostly the result of the rampant greed culture in high places that has had more than 30 years to grow and get out of hand unchecked and even overtly encouraged. It's not the only such mess that the cultural shift has produced; look at the real median income in this country for a clue about who's doing what to whom.

Charlieopera said...

I have to admit I’ve missed this kind of debate. I know, you'll missed me too.

Stipulated: there’s no excuse for the mismanagement of Katrina. Apparently unstipulated (by Obama supporters) is the fact that government red tape has precluded locals along the coast from getting things done (unless those being interviewed nightly by CNN, etc. are doing the lying and BP is telling the truth). The government seems to not know which hand is doing what. You can blame the coast guard if you prefer, but they come under Obama’s jurisdiction.

Obama FIRED the official who ignored it. Brother, that remains in dispute. Even Obama didn’t know he FIRED the official who ignored it. And there sure were more than 1 official who ignored it (were they ever fired)? Oversight is oversight. Nobody doubts Republicans prefer to look the other way on this, but the Dems sure seem to fall victim to prior lack of oversight over and over and over again (at least that’s who they blame). He was supposed to Change things, not keep them static.

You don’t have to argue greed with me, my friend. I’m a socialist. I say seize BP’s assets, but in the meantime, where the hell is the Navy and the resources they might bring to bear (for barges to block the beaches, skim the oil, keep things in order, if nothing else). Obviously the coast guard isn’t getting it done. There were people using wetvacs to skim oil and the coast guard stopped them.

I understand your angst in someone comparing Obama to Bush, but they sure look interchangeable to me.

Gerard Saylor said...

Charlie missed participating in online debates? I am shocked to hear such a thing.

Charlie's portrait for blogger looks a lot different than his author photo for Johnny Porno.

Charlieopera said...

Obviously beore the picture here, I went swimming in the Gulf.

The one for JP was taken while watching my beloved New York State Buffalo Bills choke against that team from the region called New England. a/k/a Patriots, but in Buffalo (and all places New York) we call them Teabaggers ...

Briscoe said...

Ah, yes. I've done a cartoon on this subject which I believe you'll appreciate.

http://smallworldcomics.com/2010/06/obama-katrina/

Let me know what you think!

JD Rhoades said...

Hee! Briscoe, that's great.