Sunday, September 13, 2009

A Small People, A Silly People

Latest Newspaper Column:
If there was any doubt that the modern American right has gotten too silly to be taken seriously and that the movement that once boasted intellectual heavyweights like William F. Buckley and Milton Freidman has now turned into a combination insane asylum and Klown Kollege, it's the recent outbreak of outrage over President Obama's speech to America's schoolchildren.

The very idea that this president would have the unmitigated gall to do exactly what his predecessors, like Saint Ronald Reagan, Bush the Elder and Bush the Lesser have done -- that is, actually speak to the children of America -- was enough to send these people into such a paroxysm of frothing outrage, you'd have thought he was a representative of the North American Man-Boy Love Association, not the duly elected leader of the executive branch.

Vowing that their little ones were never going to risk exposure to the "Socialist Agenda" of the Scary Dark Man, some even swore they would keep their children home from school.

Apparently, they feared that every word spoken by the president was going to worm its way into the ears of their delicate offspring like one of those bugs the bad guys used in "The Wrath of Khan," with the result that pretty soon, their kids would rise up, chanting slogans from the Little Red Book of Chairman Mao, murder their parents in their beds, then establish a Thousand Year Democratic Reich, despite not actually being old enough to vote.

Or maybe the parents were afraid the kids would start nagging them like they do for toys or breakfast cereals advertised on TV until the parents finally break down and accept universal health care.

I didn't say it made any sense.

The profound silliness of the right-wing agenda was revealed in full when the White House released the actual text of the speech before its delivery. The speech, as it runs out, was actually pretty standard stuff: Stay in school. Work hard. Take responsibility. It was something you might hear from Mr. Rogers.

I expect that the majority of kids who were actually allowed to hear the speech quickly tuned out and began texting their friends across the room or playing with their PSPs or whatever it is they do nowadays.

So then the wingnuts, as is their habit, began moving the goalposts. It wasn't the speech they were objecting to, they claimed (even though that's exactly what they'd been doing the day before). The problem was now the "lesson plan" sent out by the Department of Education, which was apparently full of hidden socialist mind control voodoo.

One fellow named Michael Knowles, a self-described leader of the San Antonio "Tea Party" movement, insisted in an interview on MSNBC that the lesson plans were actually illegal under federal law because they encouraged students "to reveal personal information about themselves" during discussions and to "reveal information about their goals."

Yep, that's right. Remember grade school, when some teachers would ask you to "tell us a little something about yourself"? Bet you never knew you were a victim of a federal crime. I sure didn't. And neither did MSNBC's Dr. Nancy Snyderman.

"You must be kidding me," Snyderman said. "Do you not want kids to be talking about what they want to be when they grow up?"

Yes, Dr. Nancy, they really are that crazy.

I'm sure you'll be shocked to know that I was never a big fan of George W. Bush. But you know what? If he'd given a televised speech to the nation's schoolchildren, I wouldn't have kept my kids home from school that day for fear he'd pollute their brains with his scary "legislative agenda."

I know full well that if I had even suggested doing such a thing, the wingnuts would be all up in arms about how "hateful liberals" couldn't even give the president a respectful hearing.

But apparently, under the Wingnut Code, the president is entitled to a respectful hearing, even on the most innocuous issues, only if he's Republican.

And white.


Indiana Joe said...

Republicans don't seem to want kids (or anyone else for that matter) deciding for themselves what they want in life. They apparently believe that people should passively accept whatever their Party leaders and corporate masters decide for them.

Fran said...

Oh man, Dusty, you're going to get flak over this one! Telling the truth is a no-no nowadays, didn't you know?

Charlieopera said...

They apparently believe that people should passively accept whatever their Party leaders and corporate masters decide for them.

Careful, Joe ... minus the kid part, the above seems to be the Democratic mantra ... they haven't "changed" a meaningful thing yet.

Think Nader in 2012 ...

becky hutchison said...

Dusty, I was talking about the same thing to my husband this weekend. I think the bottom line of all the Republican rants is your last line "And white." I can't help but feel that the Rush Linbaugh and FOX network supporters wouldn't be that uncivil to a white president. And the rudeness some Republicans displayed at the President's message to Congress was awful. I didn't always support what Bush said, but I always respected his position as POTUS.

David said...

I strongly suspect that, if they had control of the House, they would be ginning up impeachment charges that'd boil down to "Presidenting while Democratic" and "Presidenting while Black".

Gerard Saylor said...

Referencing Star Trek? What a loser.

Dory said...

Kudos! JD - Kudos!

I'm a registered REPUGNANT....You can call me crazy but I've learned in my own way how to fight the 'wingnuts."

If you can't beat 'em, join 'em and VOTE for the candidate most likely to NOT succeed. Now see, there is method to my madness...

And Indiana Joe. . .
"They apparently believe that people should passively accept whatever their Party leaders and corporate masters decide for them."

States my thoughts exactly
Wish I had said that.